I also found that LW allows you to import the car cam video as p or i, which I missed the first time. The MXP setting works better with the car cam which records at 1920* p fps. Oddly enough, the video seems clearer than that recorded with AVCHD 60p, which is supposed to be the best my cam can produce. Filtering will reduce interlace 'twitter' and Moire patterning.' /wiki/jsp/wiki?ffmbc%200.7 Posted by vespaio - 30 Dec :50 1 / 6Ģ Hi, I have switched to MXP, which records at 1920* i fps. Vertical low-pass filtering is required when creating an interlaced destination from a progressive source which contains high-frequency vertical detail. The vertical low-pass filter is specified by BBC R&D for use when converting progressive media into interlaced media. 'The port includes a vertical low-pass filter to the tinterlace filter process. Add the progressive content to a 59.94i timeline - there'll be no movement between fields I'm not sure how Lightworks interlaces progressive video - a common fault is to forget to add a vertical blur filter which causes moire, twitter etc. Interlace the progressive content (add -vf tinterlace=4) 3. De-interlace the 59.94i to 59.94p (in Eyeframe converter, add -vf w3fdif) 2. Can these formats be made compatible? Posted by st Dec :13 What are the frame-sizes and frame-rates of your original footage? By 60i, I assume you mean and the car cam is recording 29.97p or 59.94p? You could: 1. I have tried various ways to import them together, but the exported video has not been satisfactory. 1 can interlaced and progressive be used together Solved! Posted by vespaio - 28 Dec :06 I'm filming trails with a car cam that produces progressive video, and want to make a DVD (for TV) mixing it with 60i clips recorded with a Canon camcorder.

Eyeframe converter compression